I was a little disappointed with the structure of this book. The content is excellent, but it doesn't follow the same sequence as Dawkins' book, so it is difficult to relate one to the other. If you read a chapter of Dawkins, it takes a bit of hunting in Sarfati's book to find the refutation, unless you know the subject reasonably well. Still, I am finding it a useful tool for cross-checking my own refutation which is structured to follow Dawkins' book chapter by chapter, point by point. Unlike Sarfati, a scientist which I am not, I argue not the science per se but the science as substantive evidence for evolution and whether the evidence proves the case beyond reasonable doubt. I am about 90% complete and based on the responses of publishers so far, it looks like I am going to have to self-publish, which will be a fun project in itself. Still, if it is God's Will, it will get done, and if it is simply my will, then maybe it won't!
I was a little disappointed with the structure of this book. The content is excellent, but it doesn't follow the same sequence as Dawkins' book, so it is difficult to relate one to the other. If you read a chapter of Dawkins, it takes a bit of hunting in Sarfati's book to find the refutation, unless you know the subject reasonably well. Still, I am finding it a useful tool for cross-checking my own refutation which is structured to follow Dawkins' book chapter by chapter, point by point. Unlike Sarfati, a scientist which I am not, I argue not the science per se but the science as substantive evidence for evolution and whether the evidence proves the case beyond reasonable doubt. I am about 90% complete and based on the responses of publishers so far, it looks like I am going to have to self-publish, which will be a fun project in itself. Still, if it is God's Will, it will get done, and if it is simply my will, then maybe it won't!
ReplyDelete