tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6097581429595233439.post3672380261167526600..comments2023-03-24T16:44:31.630+03:00Comments on More Than Words: The New Covenant And Believers' Baptism (part 2)David Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13177521181432533108noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6097581429595233439.post-89805251607231407732008-06-09T12:52:00.000+03:002008-06-09T12:52:00.000+03:00Hmmm. I think if you have to go to the 17th centur...Hmmm. I think if you have to go to the 17th century to find another example of the use of the term, that's a case of the exception that proves the rule.<BR/><BR/>Tombes' baptist catechism is very good:<BR/><A HREF="http://www.reformedreader.org/ccc/tcat.htm" REL="nofollow">http://www.reformedreader.org/ccc/tcat.htm</A><BR/><BR/>DavidDavid Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13177521181432533108noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6097581429595233439.post-16355090335583108762008-06-02T14:00:00.000+03:002008-06-02T14:00:00.000+03:00Brother David, I believe that John Tombes, the pro...Brother David, <BR/>I believe that John Tombes, the prolific Baptist polemicist, writing during the time of the Westminster Assembly, referred to himself and his party as 'antipaedobaptists'. One of Tombes' interactions was with Stephen Marshall to whom Dr Field refers in <A HREF="http://davidpfield.blogspot.com/2008/05/our-rule-in-adminstering-of-sacraments.html" REL="nofollow">this post</A>. <BR/><BR/>Given this historical context and Field's reference to it, I don't think you should read too much into the use of the term 'antipaedobaptist".Stephenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07396284899730478332noreply@blogger.com